Can we trust our emotions in the pursuit of knowledge Essay Essays

Can we trust our emotions in the pursuit of knowledge Essay Essays Can we trust our emotions in the pursuit of knowledge Essay Essay Can we trust our emotions in the pursuit of knowledge Essay Essay I feel that cognition is larning or experiencing something that you didn’t cognize before. The chase of cognition comes through sheer experience. Knowledge surpasses formal schooling. Schooling is educational but neither text edition nor instructor can let one to see cognition that is experienced when on a journey. a journey to research new things. With emotion on will dig deep and learn more than of all time opening up avenues neer seen earlier. That is the chase of cognition. With emotions helping the chase of cognition one will larn a broader spectrum of things. Using emotions in history and the humanistic disciplines is a trusty action. In history one will see that emotions are entwined in every narrative because that is what history is. a digest of narratives from different beginnings and point of positions. Who’s to state what the truth in history is? Who is the justice on whether a historical history is true or non? No 1 is the justice. This is what makes the chase of cognition in history a strictly emotional experience. It is difficult to truly cognize what is true because in different civilizations and parts of the universe history is told from different angles. History that one learns in school is non told from different angles. It is told from an angle that portrays a certain attitude from the compiler of historical facts. Depending on what side you are on in history reflects the promotion of certain events. In schools certain subjects are talked about more frequently. such as triumphs. Although the events in history may be emotional the chase of this cognition is non emotional. It is lone information ; hence. emotions should non be trusted when covering with this type. Familial history is different for every individual because everyone has backgrounds that are of many beginnings. When a individual learns about their history it is many times unwritten history that has been told for coevalss. Oral history is bound to alter dramatically because as the narrative is told. different fluctuations and hyperboles are added. When one individual tells a narrative one part of the narrative may be enhanced and talked about more. but that parts that aren’t told as much may be the truth and most of import parts of the narrative. Familial history is emotional. This history encompasses battles and successes. Each thing that happens in a family’s history holds an emotional impact on the individual or people that witnessed these things. Many times if the yesteryear is difficult to speak about. due to heavy emotional impact. the narrative is changed or non reported. Tiing emotions to pursuit of cognition in history is unpreventable because history is an emotional topic. When a individual sees art many emotions arise that causes admiration. The journey to understanding what art is conveying is what brings Forth emotion that lead one to understanding. African drumming and dance is something that I grew up making and listening to. In the beginning it was something that I did and neer wondered about. After my retirement from beating and dancing I saw a public presentation and it set me on a roller coaster of ideas. Through the rotations and deep thump traveling in synchronism I experienced something I neer felt while playing all of those old ages. Through the drumming I felt the beat of my ain bosom and through the motions life was breathed into the auditorium. The Swift and athletic motion represented construction and heroism. The membranophones frequently turned into a unsmooth chant that spoke combatant tones and softened. as the motions became more fluid. The membranophones spoke and the motions of the dancer’s organic structures told a narrative. Through emotions. art comes alive and new cognition was gained from that individual experiences. Because there is non a incorrect reply in art it is frequently easier to swear emotions. Art is emotional. Emotional is what worlds are ; this makes us all creative person. Because swearing emotions in art is simple one can dispute their head and seek to understand what is behind the art signifier. Through pictures and assorted media different ideas could be conveyed harmonizing to what emotions it causes a individual to hold. The creative person could hold intended for it to convey one emotion when harmonizing to past experiences of the spectator it conveys a different tone. In the linguistic communication arts†¦ Although one can swear emotions in the chase of cognition one mustn’t trust emotion to formalize cognition. Peoples have their ain truths. Truth alterations. but knowledge doesn’t. Truth alterations because of a different perceptual experience that each individual has. Truth is what we all believe to be valid. Knowledge is different in every individual. The chase of cognition is a journey. When the finish is met one can’t trust emotions to weave through the truths and disproofs. but swearing your emotions on the journey is decidedly possible and makes the expedition unique to the traveller.

Feminine Mystique Definition and Background

Feminine Mystique Definition and Background The Feminine Mystique is remembered as the book that â€Å"started† the womens movement and 1960s feminism in the United States. But what is the definition of the feminine mystique? What did Betty Friedan describe and analyze in her 1963 bestseller? Famous, or Famously Misunderstood? Even people who have not read The Feminine Mystique can often identify it as a book that drew attention to the massive unhappiness of women trying to fit a media-idealized â€Å"happy suburban housewife† image. The book examined the role of women’s magazines, Freudian psychology, and educational institutions in limiting women’s life options. Betty Friedan drew back the curtain on society’s pursuit of the pervasive mystique. But exactly what did she expose? Definition of the Feminine Mystique The feminine mystique is the false notion that a woman’s â€Å"role† in society is to be a wife, mother, and housewife - nothing else. The mystique is an artificial idea of femininity that says having a career and/or fulfilling one’s individual potential somehow go against womens pre-ordained role. The mystique is the constant barrage of homemaker-nurturer-mother images that esteem the virtue of keeping house and raising children as essential womanhood while criticizing the â€Å"masculinity† of women who want to do other things, whether along with or instead of the mystique-approved duties.   In Betty Friedans Words â€Å"The feminine mystique says that the highest value and the only commitment for women is the fulfillment of their own femininity,† Betty Friedan wrote in The Feminine Mystique’s second chapter, â€Å"The Happy Housewife Heroine.†Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   It says that the great mistake of Western culture, through most of its history, has been the undervaluation of this femininity. It says this femininity is so mysterious and intuitive and close to the creation and origin of life that man-made science may never be able to understand it. But however special and different, it is in no way inferior to the nature of man; it may even in certain respects be superior. The mistake, says the mystique, the root of women’s troubles in the past is that women envied men, women tried to be like men, instead of accepting their own nature, which can find fulfillment only in sexual passivity, male domination, and nurturing maternal love. (The Feminine Mystique, New York: W.W. Norton 2001 paperback edition, pp. 91-92) One major problem was that the mystique told women it was something new. Instead, as Betty Friedan wrote in 1963, â€Å"the new image this mystique gives to American women is the old image: ‘Occupation: housewife.’† (p. 92) Inventing an Old-Fashioned Idea The new mystique made being a housewife-mother the ultimate goal, rather than recognizing that women (and men) could be freed by modern appliances and technology from many of the domestic labors of earlier centuries. Women of previous generations may have had no choice but to spend more time cooking, cleaning, washing and bearing children. Now, in mid-20th century U.S. life, instead of allowing women to do something else, the mystique stepped in and made this image: â€Å"into a religion, a pattern by which all women must now live or deny their femininity.† (p. 92) Rejecting the Mystique Betty Friedan ably dissected the messages of women’s magazines and their emphasis on buying more household products, a self-fulfilling prophecy designed to keep women in the fabricated role. She also analyzed Freudian analysis and the ways women were blamed for their own unhappiness and lack of fulfillment. The prevailing narrative told them they simply weren’t living up to the mystique’s standards.   The Feminine Mystique awakened many readers to the realization that the upper-middle-class-suburban-homemaker-mother image being spread across the land was a false idea that hurt women, families, and society. The mystique denied everyone the benefits of a world in which all people could work to their fullest potential.